Assessment

Course Level Outcomes are statements that identify what a student is expected to achieve by the end of a course. Assessment of course level outcomes is intended to measure student mastery of the stated goals found on the course outline. Formative and summative assessments (described below) are prepared by individual instructors and are given to students currently enrolled in the course. Course outcomes are listed in the course outlines and course syllabi. Some course outcomes are established to meet specific MnTransfer Goals.

Each program at HTC assesses student learning outcomes to facilitate continuous program level improvement. The assessments used are developed collaboratively among faculty of each program in alignment with the mission and goals of the college. The learning outcomes represent the goals that faculty have for student achievement after completion of a set of program courses in an award. In a similar manner, general education departments conduct department level outcomes assessment utilizing the HTC Learner Outcomes relevant to the department (e.g. the English Department assesses the HTC Learner Outcome Written Communication). For both programs and departments, the analyzed assessment results provide instructors with actionable information to advance student learning. Aggregate assessment results are reported as part of institutional accreditation efforts. Ultimately, assessment of student learning outcomes helps students attain the knowledge and abilities necessary for career success.

• HTC Learner Outcomes

Program Advancement

Academic program review is an integral part of HTC's commitment to continuous improvement. Program Advancement has been designed to be a three-year cycle, beginning with a comprehensive report filed in year one. Annually, programs/departments complete their assessment of student learning outcomes, strategic planning goals (Work Plan), and the faculty Individual Professional Development Plans (IPDP). In year one, programs are provided a template of questions based on the quality measures faculty and deans use to determine the health of the program, a program profile containing the identified data points needed to answer the questions, and an example, completed report to be used as a guide. This comprehensive review is intended to be an opportunity for programs to reflect on the past three years, and using the data, determine the elements of success and the opportunities for improvement. The goal is to be looking for ways to "advance" or grow the program. A scoring rubric with seven quality measures is used to determine progress toward those goals. The report is reviewed by the Division Dean, CFO, VPAA, and President. Faculty are invited to participate in the administrative review.

Components in the comprehensive report include:

• Program efficiency
• Faculty/Advisory committee expertise
• Financial sustainability
• Student learning outcomes assessment and strategic planning (Continuous Improvement)

Continuous Quality Improvement Cycle and Schedule for Program Advancement:

• Continuous Quality Improvement Cycle
• Program Advancement Schedule
• Strategic Program Advancement Process

HTC’s Learner Outcomes are skills and competencies for successful employment or transfer that are demonstrated college-wide by all Hennepin Tech students at the time of graduation. These outcomes, in addition to technical program skills, are highly valued by employers and are crucial for advancement in the workplace or for furthering education.

College-Wide Assessment

Individual courses in every program and department are linked to one or more of the HTC Learner Outcomes. Hennepin Tech assesses college-wide outcomes annually. Assessment of the Learner Outcomes provides an assurance that students are prepared for the workforce or transfer. Current and previous assessment activities are highlighted in the Assessment Activities section at the bottom of this page.

College-Wide Assessment Project Results

• Final Executive Summary Report FY2016 Written Communication Embedded
• Final Executive Summary Report FY 2015 Oral Communication Embedded
• Final Executive Summary Report FY 2014 Oral Communication Embedded
• Final Executive Summary Spring 2013 Interview-Oral, Written, and Technological Literacy

Assessment of Student Engagement at HTC provides the opportunity for staff, faculty, and administration to gather information on our student access services (advising, counseling, tutoring services, library services, enrollment services, etc.) that are intended to assist students in their learning. Primary tools used are the Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) and the Survey of Entering Student Engagement (SENSE). These national surveys are administered biannually during randomly selected courses and provide trend and comparison data, which are used for improving our services, as well as accreditation. Survey results are reported by year.

Evaluation tools for co-curricular activities (student senate, ambassadors, clubs, etc.) are being established. When completed, results will be reported on the Office of Institutional Research webpage.

Formative Assessment

The goal of formative assessment is to monitor student learning to provide ongoing feedback that can be used by instructors to improve their teaching and by students to improve their learning. More specifically, formative assessments:

• help students identify their strengths and weaknesses and target areas that need work
• help faculty recognize where students are struggling and address problems immediately
• may have low or no point value

Examples of formative assessments include asking students to:

• turn in a research proposal for early feedback
• write a response to “What was the muddiest point in this class session?"
• respond to an open-ended discussion question that provokes high-level thinking
• keep a daily learning and response log
• use individual whiteboards during class to give instructors at-a-glance feedback
• use clickers to answer polling questions

Summative or ‘Exit’ Assessment

The goal of summative assessment is to evaluate student learning at the end of an instructional unit by comparing it against some standard or benchmark. Summative assessments are often high stakes, which means that they have a high point value. Examples of summative assessments include:

• a mid-term paper, project, or exam
• a final paper, project, or exam
• national accreditation or licensure exam
• Technical Skills Attainment (TSA)

(Source: Carnegie Mellon University. "What is the difference between formative and summative assessment?")

At HTC, exit assessments can be a traditional final exam or, depending on the program, something more specialized such as a spoken or demonstrated practical exam. Other programs may administer externally prepared industry-specific exams that often lead to a nationally recognized credential. The MCP, or Microsoft Certified Professional, is one example. Another is the commonly recognized automotive technician certification standard known as ASE (Automotive Service Excellence). Our law enforcement students take the POST Board exam that measures pertinent knowledge for success in that career. In addition to national accreditation, some programs have implemented assessments through Technical Skills Attainment (TSA), a statewide process mandated by Minnesota Department of Education (MDE), Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System (Minn State), and the federal government under Carl Perkins IV legislation. All HTC programs participating in external accreditation or certification assessments are listed on the Program Accreditation page.